Vth Division Totals Look wrong

[paul]

I'll look into this when I get back on friday. I have to ask Bob about a few of the weekend results because I know one match was completed but no result was phoned through so there is at least one other league standings that needs amending this week.

Please let me know if you spot any others.

[paul]

I can and will add a column for forfeit matches.

I'm going to try and spend some fixing these errors this weekend.

[andrewshields]

The correct points are as follows. I assume it's the top of the table you want. All teams have played 12.

South Loughton II W9 L1 NR2 Points 247
Potter Street W8 L2 NR2 Points 223
Little Hadham W6 L4 NR2 Points 187
Newport II W6 L3 NR3 Points 181
Bengeo W6 L2 NR4 Points 177

[Greg]

The Potter Street game against Thunderidge was cancelled due circumstances within Thunderidge, therefore the points were awarded to Potter Street, hence why it seems wrong, however you are right in that the table is confusing.
It would have been simpler to show the table with just a win to Potter Street

[thomaswp]

Is it me or is the 5th Division table wrong? If the matches/bonus points etc are all correct then the points totals are wrong? I make it something like the below. Which table is correct?

<pre>
Club/Team Mch W L T A C Bat Bowl Pen Total
1 South Loughton 2nd XI 11 8 1 0 0 2 5 0 0 221
2= Little Hadham 11 6 4 0 0 1 5 12 0 177
2= Newport 2nd XI 11 6 2 0 1 2 6 3 0 177
4 Potter Street 11 6 2 0 0 3 8 4 -5 175
5 Bengeo 11 6 2 0 1 2 2 4 -5 169
6 Birchanger 2nd XI 11 4 5 0 0 2 9 17 0 138
7 Stansted 2nd XI 11 3 7 0 0 1 19 13 0 114
8 Westmill 11 3 7 0 0 1 18 8 0 108
9 Stansted Hall 2nd XI 11 1 8 0 0 2 20 23 0 77
10 Thundridge 11 2 7 0 0 2 21 20 -29 72

</pre> :-?

edited by: thomaswp, Jul 21, 2004 - 12:14 PM

[thomaswp]

OK, that makes sense. I had forgotten about the walk over. Maybe we need another column? :oops: